Product

From matched product to compared quote — in one controlled workflow

Sourcing BIPV usually lives in email threads and spreadsheets where "excluded" and "not stated" quietly become zero. SolaMaxa packages a placement strategy into a controlled RFQ, takes structured responses, and normalises quotes to explicit comparison bases — so the commercial decision rests on comparable numbers.

The RFQ workflow

Prepared, approved, issued — by people

1 · Discover suppliers

Deterministic supplier discovery from the product catalogue's company identity — manufacturers, authorised distributors and regional representatives, each with the evidence behind the relationship. No unproven "authorised" claims.

2 · Prepare from the strategy

Quantities and scope come from the accepted placement strategy — never fabricated. Data gaps and manufacturer questions import as structured questions so suppliers answer what the project actually needs.

3 · Review, approve, issue

Approval and issue are separate human steps. Issuing freezes the complete commercial record behind a hash; a branded PDF document goes out, and revisions create new versions rather than rewriting history.

4 · Receive responses

Supplier responses and documents are recorded with provenance against the RFQ version they answered. Responses feed product intelligence only as human-reviewed candidates — never as automatic catalogue updates.

5 · Normalise quotes

The supplier's original response is the authoritative record and is never overwritten. Normalisation derives structured, provenance-carrying quote data — line items, cost categories, logistics, terms.

6 · Compare on equal bases

Compare product-supply, landed or installed bases with explicit scope states, currency snapshots and Incoterms — and a transparent, chosen ordering key. Decisions are recorded with the comparison that informed them.

The honesty rule

Missing is not zero. Excluded is not zero.

Every cost and scope element carries a state: included, separately priced, excluded, optional, not applicable — or unknown. An excluded cost is never treated as free, an unknown cost is never assumed, and the system never invents an adjustment to make two quotes artificially comparable. "Supplier B cannot be compared on a landed basis because freight is not stated" is a feature.

RFQ review on the London procurement story: scope, questions, recipients.
Placeholder for a forthcoming asset: real ui — rfq preparation & approval.
Normalised comparison with basis labels and scope differences.
Placeholder for a forthcoming asset: real ui — quote comparison table.
Compared properly, not just priced

Beyond the headline number

Scope & substitutions

Requested versus offered values with typed compliance, and substitutions recorded with their rationale and effects — a supplier's marketing language never determines compliance; a person does.

Delivery & terms

Lead times structured only from explicit statements, currency conversion only via dated snapshots, and Incoterms stored exactly as quoted — FOB and DDP are not the same commercial scope.

Completeness, not compliance

A transparent completeness checklist per quote — price, scope, technical, certification, fire, logistics, warranty, lead time, terms. Completeness is reported as completeness; it never masquerades as technical compliance.

Your quotes stay yours: raw supplier pricing is confidential to the project and is never published, benchmarked across customers, or exposed to other organisations.

See it on a building you know

See the procurement workflow end to end.

From accepted placement scenario to normalised, comparable quotes — we'll walk the whole path, including the honesty rule, on a real project setup.

SolaMaxa is pre-beta. We are currently selecting the first architectural, BIPV, engineering and property teams.